ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026
Daily assessments of behavioral economic indices and drinking among rural-residing adults with at-risk drinking.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Daily assessments of behavioral economic indices and drinking among rural-residing adults with at-risk drinking.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a secondary analysis among adults with at-risk drinking who live in rural areas (N = 75; 62.7% Female; 98.7% White), we examined the predictive ability of behavioral economic (BE) indices (demand, delay discounting, and proportion of alcohol-free activities) for next-day alcohol use via daily surveys across the range of alcohol use severity. These relations were tested using linear mixed-effects models, including evaluating the interaction of BE indices with alcohol use severity. In unadjusted analyses, proportion of alcohol-free activities (β [95% CI]: -0.022 [-0.038, -0.006]), demand intensity (i.e., drinks when free; β [95% CI]: 0.267 [0.143, 0.391]), and maximum expenditure (Omax, β [95% CI]: 0.036 [0.014, 0.059]) were significant predictors of next-day alcoholic drinks consumed. In adjusted analyses, we observed a significant interaction between baseline alcohol use severity and intensity of alcohol demand (β [95% CI]: -0.014 [-0.027, -0.001]) and Omax (β [95% CI]: 0.005 [0.000, 0.010]) wherein there was a stronger relations between the BE measure and next-day drinking among lower and higher alcohol use severities, respectively. These results support the inclusion of BE measures in daily survey research to support digital and potentially just-in-time adaptive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.