ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2026
Supporting children's voice and agency in research.
Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Child abuse is highly prevalent globally and associated with profound consequences for children, underscoring the need for timely and coordinated responses such as the Children's Advocacy Centres (CAC) and the Barnahus (BH). Existing research on these models has primarily examined organisational structures and legal outcomes with significantly less attention given to children's lived experiences. In line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which emphasises both protection and participation, we argue in this editorial for a shift towards centreing children's voices and agency in research. Drawing on three research initiatives - 'Joining the Dots', 'Creating Spaces for Children', and 'Putting the Child First' - this editorial provides examples of how to meaningfully engage children in research. These projects employ creative, participatory, and trauma-informed methods to balance the children's right to protection and right to be heard when capturing the children's perspectives. They illustrate the importance of involving children in research and hence underline the risks of overlooking important insights into how support systems work in practice when children are not involved in research. This calls for greater investment in participatory approaches seeking to actively engage the children's perspectives to inform research, policy, and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.