ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Integration of Histologic Pattern Classifiers and Graph Convolutional Networks for Prognostic Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Histologic pattern classification is crucial for diagnosing and prognosticating lung adenocarcinoma, yet its clinical application remains limited by interobserver variability and difficulties in quantifying patterns across whole-slide images (WSIs). Methods: We developed a deep learning-based histologic pattern classifier trained with coarse annotations and implemented through a whole-slide approach. Classification performance was evaluated across five major growth patterns, followed by consensus analysis with expert pathologists. To predict prognosis, we integrated the classifier into a patch-level graph convolutional network (patch-GCN) that aggregated local and global morphologic features across WSIs. Model generalizability was further assessed in two external cohorts. Results: The classifier achieved a mean area under the curve of 0.991 and 90.5% expert model agreement. Consensus analysis revealed strong concordance on typical morphologies but underscored challenges for both experts and the model in regions with atypical histology. The patch-GCN achieved the best prognostic performance (concordance index: 0.789), outperforming models based solely on expert-assessed or model-predicted histologic pattern percentages. Notably, the GCN identified prognostically adverse morphologies, including complex glandular and morule-like patterns, which were not explicitly annotated during training. External validation demonstrated robust generalizability, with concordance indices of 0.654 in the TCGA-LUAD cohort and 0.868 in the NTUH cohort. Model performance depended strongly on pathology-specific feature embeddings. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a WSI-based histologic pattern classifier trained with coarse annotations and establishes a novel GCN-based prognostic framework that enhances predictive accuracy, uncovers clinically relevant morphologies beyond expert labels, and supports granular risk stratification in lung adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.