ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2026
Effects of metatarsal bar and heel lift on foot biomechanics during gait: implications for performance-related biomechanics.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the biomechanical effects of metatarsal bars (MTB) and heel lifts (HL) on lower-limb kinematics and kinetics during gait. [Participants and Methods] Twenty healthy adults underwent three-dimensional gait analysis. Ankle dorsiflexion angle, internal plantarflexion moment, medial longitudinal arch (MLA) height, and gravity movement (GM) were evaluated at 0%, 12%, 31%, and 50% of the walking cycle (WC) and at peak stance. Data were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (condition × WC), followed by Holm-adjusted post-hoc comparisons. [Results] Compared with HL, MTB significantly increased ankle dorsiflexion and decreased MLA height at 31% and 50% WC. Conversely, HL significantly reduced the plantarflexion moment at 12% WC but increased it at 50% WC and peak stance. No significant differences were found in GM, though MTB tended to shift GM posteriorly and HL anteriorly during the latter half of the stance phase. [Conclusion] MTB and HL exhibit distinct phase-specific biomechanical strategies. MTB increases dorsiflexion and reduces MLA height during mid-to-late stance (31-50% WC), suggesting a shock absorption-oriented strategy. In contrast, HL modulates plantarflexion moments to facilitate forward progression. These findings emphasize selecting orthotic components based on specific biomechanical demands at different gait phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.