ArticleCureus2026
Spectrum of Bone Marrow Pathological Findings in Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Biopsy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Bone marrow biopsy is a diagnostic cornerstone in the evaluation of unexplained cytopenias and suspected haematological neoplasms; however, diagnostic frequencies vary widely across populations. This study describes the spectrum of bone marrow pathology recorded in a single-centre registry and explores, as a secondary exploratory aim, whether it varies by sex and age. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study analysed 181 bone marrow examination records, which constituted the unit of analysis; no patient identifiers were available to confirm unique-patient status. Diagnoses were classified into 13 registry-derived categories using a prespecified, fully documented classification dictionary and subsequently collapsed into seven broad groups. The association between sex and diagnostic category was assessed using the chi-square test and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test because of sparse cell counts. Age was compared across diagnostic groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test as the prespecified primary analysis because of non-normality, with ANOVA performed as a sensitivity analysis, followed by Dunn's post hoc test. Results The median recorded age was 30 years (IQR, 20-50 years), and 66.9% of the records were from males. Acute leukaemia was the most frequent diagnosis (49.2%; 95% CI, 42.0%-56.4%), followed by aplastic anaemia/bone marrow failure syndrome (14.4%), inconclusive/deferred opinions (12.2%), non-neoplastic/reactive marrow (8.3%), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative overlap (6.1%), lymphoproliferative/plasma cell neoplasms (6.1%), and other diagnoses (3.9%). Sex was not statistically significantly associated with diagnostic category (χ² = 5.995, df = 6, p = 0.424; exact p = 0.475; Cramér's V = 0.182). Males accounted for the majority of records in most, but not all, groups; females constituted the majority in the non-neoplastic/reactive marrow group (53.3%). Age differed significantly across the groups (Kruskal-Wallis H = 40.12, df = 6, p < 0.001, epsilon-squared = 0.196). The myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative overlap group had the highest median age (62 years), whereas the aplastic anaemia/bone marrow failure syndrome group had the lowest median age (20 years). Conclusions Acute leukaemia predominated in this referral-heavy registry sample. Recorded age varied significantly by diagnostic category, whereas sex was not statistically significantly associated with diagnostic category. A substantial proportion of acute leukaemia records lacked a documented lineage subtype. Limitations related to the unit of analysis and sampling period are detailed in the text; therefore, the findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.