Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42703553›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Norepinephrine Versus Dopamine as Initial Vasoactive Therapy in Neonatal Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Tertiary Care Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Eastern India.

Moparthi Puramjai, Deepti D Pradhan, Santosh K Panda, Soumini Rath, Nirmal K Mohakud, Subhra Snigdha Panda, Manas K Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Moparthi PuramjaiPediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Deepti D PradhanPediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Santosh K PandaPediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Soumini RathPediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Nirmal K MohakudPediatric Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Subhra Snigdha PandaMedical Microbiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Manas K NayakPediatric Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Septic shock remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in preterm and low birth weight neonates. Although dopamine was traditionally used as the first-line vasoactive agent in neonatal shock, norepinephrine has emerged as a potential alternative agent of late because of its potent vasoconstrictive effects and favourable hemodynamic profile. However, evidence comparing the efficacy of these agents in septic shock in neonates remains limited. Objective To compare the efficacy of norepinephrine and dopamine as the initial vasopressor in neonatal septic shock. Methods This study was a non-blinded parallel randomized controlled trial conducted between October 2020 and October 2022 in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care center in Odisha, India. Ninety neonates with septic shock were randomized into two groups: norepinephrine group (n=45) and dopamine group (n=45). Norepinephrine was initiated at 0.2 mcg/kg/min, while dopamine was started at 10 mcg/kg/min with escalation according to clinical response. The primary outcome was reversal of shock within 45 minutes of initiation of vasoactive therapy. Secondary outcomes included requirement of additional vasoactive drugs, need for mechanical ventilation, all-cause mortality by 28 days, and incidence of complications including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Results Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable. Reversal of shock at 45 minutes was achieved in 14 neonates (31.1%) in the norepinephrine group and 16 neonates (35.5%) in the dopamine group (p=0.65). Hemodynamic parameters including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and capillary refill time improved progressively in both groups without statistically significant intergroup differences. Requirement of additional vasoactive support was observed in 11 neonates (24.4%) in the norepinephrine group and 10 neonates (22.2%) in the dopamine group (p=0.80). Mechanical ventilation was required in 16 neonates (35.5%) in the norepinephrine group and 14 neonates (31.1%) in the dopamine group (p=0.65). All-cause mortality was comparable between the groups (15.5% vs. 13.3%; p=0.76). The incidence of short-term complications including IVH, NEC, BPD, and ROP was also similar between groups. Conclusion Norepinephrine and dopamine demonstrated comparable efficacy in achieving early reversal of neonatal septic shock, with no significant differences in mortality or short-term complications. Both agents may be considered suitable initial vasoactive therapies in neonatal septic shock. Larger multicentric studies are required to establish definitive evidence-based recommendations for vasoactive management in this population.

Indexed as

dopamineneonatesnoradrenalinesepsisshock

Identifiers

PMID42703553
PMCPMC13546698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.