ArticleCureus2026
Perioperative Anemia Investigation and Management in Vascular Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Service Evaluation.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Perioperative anemia is common in vascular surgery, but it is unclear how well national guidelines are followed in its investigation. This service evaluation examined how closely routine vascular surgical practice adhered to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) recommendations for investigating iron deficiency. Methods A retrospective service evaluation of consecutive adults undergoing vascular surgery at a single NHS center was performed. Electronic records were reviewed to determine the prevalence of preoperative anemia, adherence to the BSH recommendations for iron deficiency investigation, perioperative iron therapy, transfusion, and postoperative hemoglobin recovery. Exploratory comparisons were made by preoperative anemia status. Results Fifty-seven patients were included in the evaluation, and preoperative hemoglobin levels were documented for 53/57 patients (93.0%), of whom 32/53 (60.4%) were anemic (hemoglobin <130 g/L). Among patients with anemia, ferritin was measured in 14/32 (43.8%), but only 8/32 (25.0%) underwent a complete iron deficiency assessment. Iron therapy was initiated during the perioperative episode in 9/57 patients (15.8%). Nine patients (9/57, 15.8%) received a postoperative RBC transfusion, of whom 8/9 (88.9%) had preoperative anemia. Patients with preoperative anemia had a lower postoperative hemoglobin nadir than those without anemia (median 87 vs 126 g/L; Mann-Whitney U = 530.5; p < 0.001). Hemoglobin recovery was assessable in 35/57 patients (61.4%), of whom 22/35 (62.9%) had documented recovery to at least their preoperative concentration during available follow-up. Conclusions Preoperative anemia was common in this cohort, but investigation of its underlying cause was often incomplete. Only 8/32 patients with anemia (25.0%) underwent a complete iron deficiency assessment, hindering the classification of iron status and the provision of cause-directed management. Improving adherence to a structured diagnostic pathway is the principal opportunity for local quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.