ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Landscape of acquired resistance alterations in gastrointestinal malignancies after genomically targeted therapy.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Targeted therapies directed at specific genomic alterations have transformed the management of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers; however, acquired resistance remains inevitable. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis via liquid biopsy provides a non-invasive approach to characterize genomic mechanisms of resistance. We therefore evaluated patterns of acquired genomic resistance in patients with GI cancers treated with targeted therapies. Methods: Patients with GI cancers treated with standard of care or investigational therapies targeting EGFR, HER2, FGFR, MET, KRAS, BRAF for at least 60 days who underwent both baseline comprehensive genomic profiling and post-progression ctDNA sequencing were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Of 106 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 45 had biliary tract cancer (BTC), 42 colorectal cancer (CRC), and 19 other GI malignancies. At least one putative resistance-associated alteration was detected in ctDNA in 53% of cases. Resistance patterns were heterogeneous with 47% showing no detectable alterations and 33% harboring ≥2 resistance alterations. Among 164 total alterations, the majority were single nucleotide variants (82%), followed by amplifications (17%). Overall, 48% were classified as 'bypass' alterations-activating alternative oncogenic pathways, most commonly MAPK signaling-while 52% were 'on-target' alterations involving secondary changes within the drug target. RAS alterations represented a key mechanism of bypass resistance, accounting for 28% of all resistance alterations. Interestingly, in CRC, bypass alterations predominated (69%), whereas in BTCs, on-target alterations were more frequent (61%). Conclusions: Liquid biopsies frequently identify acquired resistance following targeted therapy across GI cancers, often revealing multiple concurrent alterations. Patterns of resistance varied by tumor type, with both on-target and bypass mechanisms observed. These findings highlight common themes of resistance and support the growing clinical role of ctDNA analysis in defining resistance and guiding management in GI malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.