ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Non-operative management of rectal adenocarcinoma in a safety-net system: a decade of real-world outcomes outside watch-and-wait eligibility.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent guidelines increasingly support watch-and-wait (W&W) strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) following favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy. However, these strategies have largely been validated in highly selected trial populations and require intensive surveillance that may be difficult to implement in underserved settings. Limited data exist on outcomes among patients affected by adverse social determinants of health, particularly in safety-net hospital systems. We evaluated outcomes of patients with LARC in an underserved setting who were managed non-operatively out of necessity, rather than according to W&W guidelines. Most of the presented cohort would not have met eligibility criteria for contemporary W&W trials and received care that largely predated widespread adoption of W&W, allowing assessment of whether comparable outcomes are achievable in a higher-risk, real-world population. This retrospective study included patients with LARC managed non-operatively with definitive intent at a single safety-net hospital system over a decade. All patients received radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. Clinical characteristics, treatment details, and oncologic outcomes were abstracted. Forty-nine patients were identified with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 8-90 months). The cohort was 55% male and racially/ethnically diverse (63% Hispanic, 20% White, 12% Black). Most patients (69%) were uninsured. Reasons for non-operative management included patient preference (49%), suspicion of low-burden metastatic or non-regional nodal disease (35%), and medical comorbidities (16%). The majority (76%) received long-course chemoradiotherapy (50-55 Gy with concurrent capecitabine); the remainder received short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy/5 fractions). Local failure did not differ significantly between regimens (P=0.51). Two-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 59%, 43%, and 67%, respectively. Eighteen patients (37%) achieved an initial complete or near-complete clinical response, of whom 5 developed local recurrence. Distant-only metastasis was the most common recurrence pattern. Despite inclusion of higher-risk patients who would not meet standard W&W criteria, radiotherapy-based non-operative management achieved meaningful local control, with regrowth rates among responders comparable to prospective trials. These findings support the feasibility of organ-preserving approaches in safety-net populations even when adherence to W&W surveillance protocols remains challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.