Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42703385›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to 0.75% Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: An Observational Study.

Sumitha Babu, Kagathi Ramesh Vasantha Kumar, Aditi V Prabhu, Shruthi Rajagopala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sumitha BabuAnaesthesiology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagamangala, IND.
Kagathi Ramesh Vasantha KumarAnaesthesiology, Sri Balaji Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Renigunta, IND.
Aditi V PrabhuCritical Care Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Mangalore, IND.
Shruthi RajagopalaAnaesthesiology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagamangala, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Peripheral nerve blockade is increasingly used in upper limb orthopedic surgery to provide effective anesthesia and prolonged postoperative analgesia while reducing systemic opioid requirements. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block provides reliable anesthesia for surgeries of the elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand, and adjuvants are frequently added to local anesthetics to improve block quality and prolong analgesia. Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl are two such adjuvants, but their comparative effects on onset, duration, and quality of blockade remain unclear. This observational study compared dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methodology A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, over 18 months from November 2016 to April 2018. Sixty eligible patients aged 18 to 65 years, of ASA physical status I or II, undergoing elective upper limb orthopedic surgery under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block were enrolled consecutively and observed across two exposure groups of 30 each, categorized according to the adjuvant selected by the treating anesthesiologist as part of routine clinical practice. Group A received ropivacaine 0.75% (30 mL) with dexmedetomidine 50 micrograms, while Group B received ropivacaine 0.75% (30 mL) with fentanyl 75 micrograms, under ultrasound guidance. Sensory blockade was assessed by the pinprick method and motor blockade by the modified Bromage scale. Heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored, and adverse effects were recorded. Results Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except mean body weight, which was lower in Group A. The mean onset of sensory blockade was 8.45 minutes in Group A compared with 1.83 minutes in Group B, and the mean onset of motor blockade was 11.27 minutes versus 2.87 minutes, both p<0.0001. Complete sensory blockade was attained at 12.90 minutes in Group A versus 5.90 minutes in Group B, and complete motor blockade at 20.12 minutes versus 7.06 minutes, both p<0.0001. Duration of sensory blockade was 883.17 minutes (SD 66.27) in Group A versus 404.00 minutes (SD 95.85) in Group B, and duration of motor blockade was 819.07 minutes versus 380.38 minutes, both p<0.0001. Postoperative analgesia lasted 977.79 minutes (SD 66.90) in Group A compared with 492.66 minutes (SD 106.14) in Group B, p<0.0001. Complete motor blockade was achieved in 24 patients (80%) in Group A versus 16 patients (53.33%) in Group B, p=0.0285. Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in Group B from five minutes onward, while diastolic pressure was consistently higher in Group A. No hypotension, bradycardia, or respiratory depression was recorded in either group. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine, when added to 0.75% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block, was associated with a significantly longer duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesia, along with denser motor blockade, compared with fentanyl, despite a slower onset. Fentanyl was associated with a faster onset of blockade. Both adjuvants demonstrated a favorable safety profile, favoring dexmedetomidine when prolonged analgesia is clinically prioritized.

Indexed as

brachial plexus blockdexmedetomidinefentanylropivacaineultrasonography interventional

Identifiers

PMID42703385
PMCPMC13546439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.