ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Associations between sociodemographic factors, experience of death and dying, and death literacy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Death literacy is the knowledge and skills that enable people to navigate and act on end-of-life issues, and underpins public health approaches to palliative and end-of-life care. Nationally representative evidence on factors associated with death literacy remains limited. Objectives: To measure death literacy in adults and examine associations with sociodemographic characteristics and experiential exposure. Design and methods: A cross-sectional online survey of a nationally representative United Kingdom (UK) sample (n = 2,106), completing the Death Literacy Index-Revised (DLI-R) and providing sociodemographic and contextual information. Weighted data were analysed using descriptive statistics and linear regression. Results: The mean DLI-R score was 6.01 (SD = 1.85). The Experiential Knowledge scale had the highest score (7.15, SD = 1.98), while Accessing Help had the lowest (5.16, SD = 2.64). Compared to no experiential exposure, personal/family exposure (B = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53, 0.85) and professional/volunteer exposure (B = 1.38, 95% CI 1.14, 1.63) were significantly associated with higher DLI-R scores. Adults aged 25-34 scored higher than those aged 65+ (B = 0.45, 95% CI 0.18, 0.71). Compared to the married group, the 'single and never married' group (B = -0.61, 95% CI -0.82, -0.41) had lower DLI-R scores. There were ethnic differences in scores, with Black/Black British people found to have higher death literacy compared to the reference group of White/White British people (B = 0.71, 95% CI 0.35, 1.08). Conclusion: This study identified gaps in UK death literacy with findings highlighting that death literacy is shaped mostly by personal and professional experience. Public health approaches that promote community learning, and clearer support pathways, may help address these gaps. Further work is needed to identify effective ways to strengthen death literacy at a population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.