ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
Research Progress on Pathogenesis, Modern Interventions and Neuromodulatory Mechanisms of Acupuncture for Tinnitus.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tinnitus refers to the subjective abnormal auditory perception occurring without external sound stimuli, characterized by prominent clinical heterogeneity and complicated pathophysiological mechanisms, which severely impair patients' mental health and quality of life. Adopting a standardized literature retrieval procedure, this paper systematically sorts out the epidemiological characteristics, clinical classifications and diagnostic criteria of tinnitus, and deeply analyzes its dual pathological mechanisms involving peripheral auditory damage (hair cell injury, auditory nerve lesions) and abnormal central nervous system plasticity (auditory cortex remodeling, neurotransmitter imbalance, abnormal activation of the limbic system). It systematically summarizes mainstream Western medical interventions and critically evaluates the clinical efficacy and inherent research limitations of pharmacotherapy, sound therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and other neuromodulation techniques. Meanwhile, it integrates the traditional theories, neuromodulatory mechanisms and available clinical trial evidence of acupuncture for tinnitus treatment. Existing basic and clinical studies indicate that acupuncture can alleviate tinnitus symptoms and regulate autonomic nervous disorders to a certain extent by improving cochlear microcirculation, upregulating the expression of inhibitory GABA neurotransmitters, and remodeling functional connectivity of the brain's default mode network. Nevertheless, clinical trials on acupuncture are plagued by remarkable methodological flaws: acupoint prescriptions and acupuncture manipulation protocols are highly heterogeneous, outcome assessment indicators are inconsistent, most studies adopt single-center small-sample designs, long-term follow-up data exceeding one year are scarce, psychological placebo effects cannot be fully isolated, and efficacy reports vary widely across studies. At present, unified high-quality evidence is still lacking to confirm its stable clinical efficacy. As a narrative review, this paper abandons one-sided positive narratives and applies consistent evaluation criteria to balance the comparison of merits and drawbacks of all Chinese and Western therapeutic interventions. It fully discloses the procedures of literature retrieval, screening and synthesis, aiming to provide objective and reproducible theoretical and clinical references for standardized comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus as well as interdisciplinary basic mechanistic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.