ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Social Reintegration and Associated Factors Among Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social reintegration is an important patient-centered outcome for patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD), reflecting their ability to maintain daily activities and social roles during long-term home-based treatment. However, evidence regarding social reintegration and its associated factors in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis remains limited. Objective: To evaluate social reintegration among adults receiving maintenance peritoneal dialysis and to identify associated clinical, nutritional, and functional factors. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional study included adults receiving maintenance PD in China. Social reintegration was assessed using the Social Reintegration Grading Method and classified as low or high. Nutritional status was assessed using the Subjective Global Assessment, and activities of daily living (ADL) using the Barthel Index. Univariable analyses were followed by Firth's penalized logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the findings. Results: Among 202 participants, 37 (18.3%) had low social reintegration and 165 (81.7%) had high social reintegration. Dialysis duration of more than 10 years was associated with lower odds of high social reintegration (OR = 0.293, 95% CI: 0.088-0.975, Conclusion: The majority of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis were classified as having high social reintegration. However, dialysis duration of more than 10 years and dependence in activities of daily living were associated with lower odds of high social reintegration. These findings support incorporating social reintegration and functional assessment into routine peritoneal dialysis follow-up. Patients with prolonged dialysis duration or reduced functional independence may require additional support to maintain daily functioning and social roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.