ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2026
Clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with axial psoriatic arthritis: Baseline findings from the GESPIC-axial-PsA cohort.
Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Axial disease is a domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), referred to as axial-PsA. Despite recent advances and increasing recognition, axial-PsA remains poorly defined; validated classification criteria and longitudinal cohorts are lacking. Objectives: We aimed to characterise axial-PsA and delineate phenotypes in an imaging-confirmed cohort. Design: GESPIC-axPsA, a dedicated arm of the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort (GESPIC), is a prospective, monocentric, study including patients with psoriasis and clinically diagnosed axial-PsA confirmed by imaging. Baseline assessments included clinical phenotyping, laboratory testing, biosample-collection, radiographs of the axial skeleton, and MRI of the whole spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJs). Methods: The analysis was primarily descriptive, characterizing baseline clinical and imaging features of patients with imaging-confirmed axial-PsA; categorical and continuous variables were summarized using appropriate measures based on their distribution, and subgroup comparisons were performed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables after assessing normality. Results: We enrolled 107 axial-PsA patients (55% female; mean age 44.8 years); 78.5% had active psoriasis, 78.6% had inflammatory back pain (IBP), and 48.6% were HLA-B27 positive. Radiographic sacroiliitis was present in 45.7%. On MRI, active/structural SIJ lesions were seen in 53.3%/73.3%; spinal active/structural lesions in 60.0%/53.3%. Both Classification criteria for axSpA (ASAS) and PsA (CASPAR) were simultaneously fulfilled in 60.7%. We identified 20 patients (18.7%) with spine-only involvement-spinal MRI lesions without SIJ lesions on radiography or MRI. Compared with the remainder, the spine-only group was older, more often female, less frequently HLA-B27-positive, and had back pain less consistent with IBP (all p<0.05). Conclusions: In our imaging-confirmed axial-PsA cohort using standardized whole-spine and SIJ MRI, we observed marked phenotypic heterogeneity. Approximately one fifth had isolated spinal involvement; this subgroup differed by age, sex, HLA-B27, and IBP features, with imaging distributions distinct from axSpA-supporting the need for disease-specific classification criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.