ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Radiomic prediction of early progression at 2 years post-treatment in patients with resectable rectal cancer based on rectal tumor and mesentery characteristics: a two-center study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Resectable rectal cancer carries a high risk of postoperative early progression (EP) within 2 years, which seriously affects patients' long-term survival outcomes. Current routine clinical evaluation strategies cannot accurately identify high-risk individuals, while radiomics and deep learning derived from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow quantitative mining of hidden tumor microenvironmental features. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of preoperative MRI radiomics and deep learning for EP in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis included 255 patients with rectal cancer from The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Center 1) and 69 patients from the Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University (Center 2). Patients from Center 1 were divided into a training set (n=204) and a test set (n=51) in an 8:2 ratio. Patients from Center 2 served as the external validation set (n=69). These patients were followed up, and the occurrence of EP (tumor recurrence or metastasis within 2 years of treatment) was recorded. Of the 324 patients with rectal cancer, 81 had EP and 243 did not. Features were extracted and filtered from MRI imaging data to construct radiomics and deep-radiomics models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the models' predictive performance. Additionally, decision curves were used to assess the models' discriminatory performance. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to visually demonstrate the feature contributions in the performance model and to illustrate the interpretability of the best model. Results: Nine radiomic features and ten deep radiomic features were selected. For the radiomics model, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was chosen as the classifier. For the deep radiomics model, extremely randomized trees (ExtraTrees) were chosen as the classifier. According to SHAP, the features contributing most markedly to the deep radiomics model were, in order: DL_resnet18_3, DL_resnet18_6, and T2surround_wavelet-HTL_glcm_Imc2. The deep-radiomics model [AUC =0.881; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.821-0.940] significantly outperformed the radiomic model (AUC =0.777; 95% CI: 0.701-0.854). The Delong test revealed that the difference in predictive performance between the two models was extremely statistically significant (P<0.02). Conclusions: A deep-radiomics model based on pre-treatment MRI images demonstrates good performance in predicting post-treatment EP outcomes in patients with resectable rectal cancer. The SHAP algorithm provides interpretability at the individual level and supplies a basis for personalized post-treatment care in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.