ReviewCureus2026
Current Evidence on the Management of Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a life-threatening form of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), caused by severe intestinal hypoperfusion in the absence of an obstructive lesion of the mesenteric arteries. Early diagnosis and management remain challenging because the condition often develops in critically ill patients and frequently presents with non-specific clinical manifestations. This comprehensive narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding the management of NOMI. A comprehensive literature search was performed. Evidence relating to hemodynamic resuscitation, imaging, catheter-directed therapies, surgical management, bowel viability assessment, nutritional support, and postoperative care was critically synthesized. Current evidence supports immediate correction of the underlying low-flow state, optimization of systemic perfusion, and urgent multiphase computed tomography angiography as the cornerstones of management. Catheter-directed intra-arterial vasodilator therapy with papaverine may improve mesenteric perfusion in carefully selected patients without established bowel infarction, although supporting evidence remains predominantly observational. Conversely, patients with peritonitis, perforation, or convincing evidence of transmural necrosis require prompt surgical exploration, using damage-control principles when appropriate. Despite recent advances in critical care, imaging, and endovascular techniques, the available evidence remains limited by small retrospective studies and considerable heterogeneity. Early recognition, multidisciplinary management, and standardized institutional treatment pathways are likely to represent the most effective strategies for improving outcomes, while prospective multicenter studies are needed to establish evidence-based management algorithms and optimize patient selection for emerging therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.