ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2026
Clinical Application of Long-Read Sequencing for FMR1 Gene Mutation Detection in Populations From Shandong, China.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFragile X syndrome (FXS) is a common inherited intellectual disability. In this study, long-read sequencing was used for the FMR1 gene detection.
methodsMen with familial inherited intellectual disability and women with indications for FXS screening were defined as high-risk populations and were included in this study along with non-high-risk reproductive-aged women. PCR-capillary electrophoresis was used for preliminary screening of non-high-risk reproductive-aged women, and long-read sequencing was performed on abnormal samples and samples from high-risk populations. Prenatal diagnosis using long-read sequencing was performed for pregnant women in need.
resultsThe prevalence of mutation in high-risk females was 3.10% (7/226). 3 mutations were detected in male samples, with a mutation ratio of approximately 8.3% (3/36). The three most common CGG repeats were 29, 30, and 36, respectively. Analysis of AGG interruption pattern in 242 samples identified 908 AGG interruptions, involving 67 different patterns. The most frequent AGG interruption pattern was (CGG)
conclusionLong-read sequencing-based assay cannot only accurately detect CGG repeat and AGG interruption, but also simultaneously identify other abnormalities of the FMR1 gene. Long-read sequencing offers a broader detection scope and better characterization of FXS-related genetic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.