ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Disturbance Mosaics Shape Multiple Pollinator Taxa Across Spatial and Temporal Scales in Fire-Managed Forests.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because forests are critical to a large fraction of global pollinator diversity, there is great interest in better understanding how changes in forest cover, structure, and composition affect these essential organisms. Fire is one of the key drivers of such changes worldwide, yet the effects of variation in fire regimes on pollinator communities remain poorly understood. We tested how fire history, roads, and tree composition jointly influence the richness, abundance, assemblage composition, and trait structure of bees, butterflies, and hover flies in a fire-managed forest landscape in the southeastern United States. We evaluated a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. Fire richness, defined as the number of unique fire histories surrounding a sampling location, was positively associated with bee and hover fly richness and with butterfly and hover fly abundance, although the most informative scales differed among taxa and responses. Fire frequency was positively associated with bee richness and butterfly abundance and with the abundance of several focal species. Relationships with roads differed among taxa: bee richness and abundance increased with surrounding road length, whereas butterfly abundance decreased. Local forest structure and composition also correlated with pollinator richness, abundance, and assemblage composition. Canopy openness correlated positively with bee richness and abundance, the proportion of pine correlated positively with butterfly abundance but negatively with hover fly abundance, and local tree richness showed a weak positive correlation with the proportion of bees classified as forest-dependent. Taken together, these patterns illustrate that conserving pollinators in a changing world will require managing landscapes to sustain diverse disturbance histories and compositionally distinct tree assemblages that maintain a broad range of habitat conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.