ArticleHead & neck2026
Blueberry Extract Has Anti-Proliferative Activity in Preclinical Models of Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Head & neck, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) arises from premalignant lesions and has a high rate of disease relapse. Novel therapies are needed to treat established tumors and prevent progression of premalignant lesions.
methodsMultiple immunocompetent murine models of oral cancer were used to explore the effects of blueberry extract (BE) on tumor control and anti-tumor immune responses.
resultsBE added to drinking water provided robust tumor growth delay, resulting in frequent tumor rejection when combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in one model. Tumor immune profiling, RNA sequencing, and cell depletion studies suggest that BE acts primarily via non-immune, antioxidant mechanisms. When given to mice in the 4-NQO carcinogenesis model, BE showed modest activity as a chemoprevention strategy; in a model mimicking minimal residual disease, BE showed no appreciable benefit.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that BE may have some utility as an adjunct to standard therapies for HNSCC, with limited utility during early tumorigenesis but more efficacy at later stages of tumor progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.