ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026
Do individual or societal consequences matter more? Reducing antibiotic expectations for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in females.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent public health threat. Antibiotic prescriptions in primary care, such as for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in females, contribute substantially to antibiotic overuse. We examined whether consequence-based risk communication emphasizing either individual (gut microbiome disruption) or societal (AMR) consequences can reduce expectations to receive antibiotics and improve decision-related outcomes. DESIGN AND
methodsAcross three online experiments (N = 3057), women in the United Kingdom were exposed to a hypothetical physician consultation for an uncomplicated UTI. Depending on the experimental condition, the physician explained individual consequences of antibiotic use, societal consequences or no such consequences. Outcomes included expectations to receive antibiotics, trust in the physician and decisional conflict.
resultsAn internal meta-analysis showed that both societal and individual consequence messages significantly reduced patients' expectations to receive antibiotics. Neither message type undermined trust in the physician (in Studies 1 and 2), and both communication messages significantly reduced decisional conflict (in Study 3).
conclusionsThese findings indicate that brief, targeted communication regarding consequences of antibiotic use can lower antibiotic expectations and support decision-making without eroding physician trust. Such messages represent a useful tool that can be adapted to different clinical contexts for patient-centred antibiotic stewardship in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.