Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42702910›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026

The Social Amplification of Risk Framework Revisited: Report From an Exst Workshop on Opportunities for Conceptual Advancement.

Seth P Tuler, Angela Bearth, Lisbet Fjæran, Rui Gaspar, Kenneth Pettersen Gould, Bonnie Ram, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Thomas Webler, Rob Goble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seth P TulerDepartment of Integrative and Global Studies, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3930-1107
Angela BearthConsumer Behavior, Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-6468
Lisbet FjæranDepartment of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-3428
Rui GasparHEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0943-6658
Kenneth Pettersen GouldDepartment of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Bonnie RamUniversity of Delaware, Center for Research in Wind & RamPower Consultancy, Washington D.C, USA.
Pia-Johanna SchweizerResearch Institute for Sustainability (RIFS) at GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-4366
Thomas WeblerSocial and Environmental Research Institute, Shelburne, Massachusetts, USA.
Rob GobleGeorge Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-5996

Funding

Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) is intended to facilitate the integration of studies about risk across natural, biological, physical, and social sciences. Researchers employing SARF have advanced understandings of the complex dynamic responses of social systems to hazards, the ways that risks are experienced and perceived, and the ways that consequences can ripple across social and governance systems, geographies, and economic sectors. In seeking to build on a Special Issue of Risk Analysis on SARF organized and edited by Kasperson, et al. (2022), an international interdisciplinary group of scholars convened an invited expert Workshop on SARF at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich during April 2024. Here we report on the outcomes emerging from the workshop. First, we sought to clarify definitions of concepts, such as risk signals, risk amplification, and risk attenuation. Second, we sought to overcome the tendency in studies using SARF to focus on information processing by the public and neglect the ways that other social actors play roles in risk amplification and attenuation. Third, we propose a new metaphor, risk resonance, to focus attention on why certain risk signals gain traction and others do not, which has also been a topic that has to date received minimal attention. Fourth, our discussions led us to highlight the importance of better integration of context and history into analyses employing SARF. We conclude the paper with thoughts about how the framework can achieve its yet unmet potential to inform risk research, policy, and management.

Indexed as

hazard managementresonanceriskrisk amplificationrisk attenuationrisk dynamicsrisk managementrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID42702910
PMCPMC13547765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.