ArticleThe plant genome2026
Sparse phenotyping for wheat grain yield enabled by multiomics prediction.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sparse phenotyping for wheat grain yield enabled by multiomics prediction.The plant genome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grain yield is a central target in wheat breeding, yet accurately predicting it remains challenging because it depends on many genes and responds strongly to environmental variation. Genomic selection (GS) has improved breeding efficiency by enabling genome-based prediction of genetic merit, but predictability (PA) for grain yield is often limited under stress environments. At the same time, advances in high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide phenomic data that capture environment-responsive plant performance and may complement genomic information. In this study, we evaluated genomic and phenomic models for predicting grain yield in elite bread wheat lines across irrigated, drought, and heat-stress environments. Using a sparse phenotyping framework, we compared parametric and non-parametric models. PA was evaluated within environments and under cross-environment sparse phenotyping scenarios. Genomic models provided a stable baseline and enabled effective information sharing across environments when phenotypic data were incomplete. Phenomics-only models captured environment-specific plant responses but were more sensitive to environmental context. Multiomics models that integrated genomic and phenomic information consistently achieved the highest PA, with the largest gains observed under stress conditions. Overall, our results demonstrate that integrating genomics and UAV-based phenomics within sparse phenotyping designs offers a practical and scalable approach to improve grain yield prediction in wheat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.