Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42702800›Full record

ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2026

Dynamical system modeling in schizophrenia: a narrative review of computational psychiatry frameworks.

Héléne Soydemir, Christophe Gauld, Mathieu Desroches, Baptiste Pignon, Damien Depannemaecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Héléne SoydemirAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0009-0006-6709-4664
Christophe GauldSANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Service de psychopathologie du développement, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4510-6186
Mathieu DesrochesInria Branch at the University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-4207
Baptiste PignonAPHP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-3136
Damien DepannemaeckerAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-4560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporal evolution of schizophrenia symptoms is inherently complex and non-linear. Clinical states fluctuate between relatively stable and highly disorganised phases. These dynamics are only partially captured by conventional diagnostic frameworks. This limitation has motivated the development of models that explicitly account for temporal structure and state transitions. Dynamical systems theory provides a rigorous framework for describing non-linear interactions and evolving symptom trajectories. Recent advances in longitudinal data acquisition and computational analysis have enabled the identification of informative dynamical features and the characterisation of patient-specific trajectories. This narrative review synthesises the growing body of work applying dynamical systems theory to schizophrenia spectrum disorders. It distinguishes theoretical models, data-driven approaches, and frameworks empirically evaluated against real patient data. It also examines methodological limitations, translational challenges, and the need for further longitudinal validation. The aim is to provide a coherent conceptual framework for understanding schizophrenia as a dynamic process, to promote cross-disciplinary dialogue, and to guide future research in translational computational psychiatry.

Indexed as

PsychiatrySchizophreniaHumanscomputational psychiatrydynamical systems modelingprecision psychiatrySchizophreniasymptom trajectoriestranslational research

Identifiers

PMID42702800
PMCPMC13552316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.