SynthesisPain research & management2026
Analgesic and Functional Outcomes of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Quadratus Lumborum Block After Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analgesic and Functional Outcomes of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Quadratus Lumborum Block After Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain research & management · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) are regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery. No meta-analysis has directly compared these techniques. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared analgesic, opioid-sparing, functional, and safety outcomes between PENG block and QLB.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles until April 15, 2026. Head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PENG block with QLB were included. The primary outcome was postoperative pain, and the secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, functional recovery, and adverse events. Pain outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences and converted to mean differences on a 0-10 scale for comparison with the 1-point minimal clinically important difference.
resultsSeven RCTs (536 patients) were included. No significant differences were observed between PENG block and QLB across eight pain assessment windows (four time points, at rest and during movement). After pain data conversion, six of eight pooled estimates fell within ±1 point, indicating no clinically important difference. Scores for the remaining two windows (early pain during movement and 24-h resting pain) were inconclusive because of high heterogeneity and very low certainty evidence. Notably, 24-h opioid consumption and nausea and vomiting incidence were similar between PENG block and QLB. Narrative synthesis suggested a preliminary, transient motor-sparing advantage with PENG in some RCTs, requiring confirmation in adequately powered trials.
conclusionPENG block and QLB provide comparable analgesia, opioid-sparing benefits, and short-term safety after hip surgery. However, the evidence for early pain during movement and 24-h resting pain exhibited high heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence and should be interpreted cautiously. A possible early motor-sparing benefit of PENG block is an exploratory signal and warrants further confirmation in adequately powered trials using objective functional endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.