ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2026
Youth Digital Mental Health Training Needs in Academic and Industry Sectors.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the limited availability of evidence-based, in-person mental health care, digital mental health (DMH) is a rapidly growing field that is uniquely poised to address mental health needs in children and adolescents. The youth DMH field operates across multiple sectors (e.g., academic and industry) and bridges multiple disciplines (e.g., child development, clinical psychology, user design/experience, pediatrics), but little is known about the training needs and existing opportunities to prepare students to effectively contribute to the youth DMH workforce. To address this gap, the current study conducted a needs assessment, using a mixed-methods survey design, with an academic (N = 107) sample asked about training needs, strengths, and barriers in an academic research environment, and an industry (N = 60) sample asked to identify training needs, strengths, and barriers for graduates to effectively contribute to youth DMH industry roles. Quantitative findings suggest different training needs are endorsed at different frequencies by academic and industry sectors. The academic sample emphasized training needs in DMH-relevant research design and methodology, whereas the industry sample prioritized training in the fundamentals of healthcare administration. Qualitative findings highlighted the key priorities across academic and industry fields, including the logistics of conducting academic research (e.g., funding resources and research design) and translating academic research training into an industry space (e.g., demonstrating value for business and understanding industry research standards). These findings indicate a need for academic programs to provide tailored training and support to ready trainees to advance effective youth DMH.
Identifiers
42702692What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.