Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42702681›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2026

To trace or not to trace: analytical insights from network-based contact-tracing models.

Giulia de Meijere, Andrea Pugliese, Gerardo Iñiguez, Péter L Simon, István Z Kiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia de MeijereTampere Complexity Lab, Data Science Research Centre, Tampere University, 33720, Tampere, Finland. giulia.demeijere@tuni.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-2256
Andrea PuglieseDepartment of Mathematics, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 14, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Gerardo IñiguezTampere Complexity Lab, Data Science Research Centre, Tampere University, 33720, Tampere, Finland.
Péter L SimonInstitute of Mathematics, Eötvös Loránd University, National Laboratory for Health Security, Budapest, Hungary.
István Z KissNetwork Science Institute, Northeastern University London, London, E1W 1LP, UK. istvan.kiss@nulondon.ac.uk.

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact tracing is one of the most important control measures deployed during epidemics and pandemics, relying on the identification of contacts of known infected individuals. A network perspective is therefore essential for its accurate modelling. Pairwise models have been used extensively to study contact tracing, but their analysis typically depends on a decoupling assumption-most commonly that contact tracing operates on a much faster timescale than disease transmission. Furthermore, contact tracing models often assume that each infected individual becomes a contact tracing-triggering node, which is unrealistic given partial compliance to treatment in practice. In this paper, we relax both of these restrictive assumptions and provide a full analytical characterisation of the epidemic threshold in the pairwise mean-field model. Our analysis uses a fast-variables approach that captures the rapid early stabilisation of key network quantities. In addition, inspired by mechanisms from social adoption dynamics, we introduce triplewise contact tracing in which an infected individual can be traced not only through direct contact with a single tracing-triggering neighbor (pairwise tracing), but also indirectly when connected to two tracing-triggering nodes simultaneously. For pure pairwise and pure triplewise contact tracing, we derive analytical expressions for critical contact tracing thresholds and demonstrate that when many infected individuals bypass treatment, the epidemic can become uncontrollable. When both contact tracing mechanisms operate together, we map out their combined contribution and relative impact on epidemic control. This unified framework yields rigorous and tractable threshold conditions for contact tracing dynamics on networks, extending the applicability of pairwise models beyond the fast-tracing regime and providing new insight into the interplay between disease progression, partial treatment compliance, and higher-order tracing processes.

Indexed as

Contact TracingEpidemiological ModelsModels, BiologicalComputer SimulationCOVID-19EpidemicsHumansMathematical ConceptsPandemicsSARS-CoV-234C2334C6092D30

Identifiers

PMID42702681
PMCPMC13547156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.