Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42702665›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2026

Elastic Intracorporeal Retraction in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Performance, Safety, and Multi-Organ Applications.

Youssef Andraos, Safwan Taha, Riwa Deghaim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youssef AndraosDepartment of General and Bariatric Surgery, Abou Jaoudeh Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon. yaandraos@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-4996
Safwan TahaDepartment of Surgery, Mediclinic Airport Road Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0174-4445
Riwa DeghaimIndependent Researcher, Beirut, Lebanon. riwadeghaim@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2137-9219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective organ retraction is essential for safe minimally invasive bariatric surgery. Traditional retraction techniques have notable limitations: rigid external retractors require subxiphoid incisions and are associated with hepatic trauma and biochemical liver injury, while handheld retractors require additional trocars, increasing complications and operative time. The Elastic Intracorporeal Retractor (EICR) was developed as a trocar-free, hands-free multi-organ retraction system.

objectivesTo evaluate the intraoperative performance, technical feasibility, and safety of the EICR in consecutive laparoscopic bariatric procedures.

settingTertiary care center.

methodsThis retrospective study included 96 consecutive procedures performed between January 2022 and January 2025 by a single surgeon. The EICR (XNY Medical) was deployed through a standard 10-mm trocar. Primary outcomes included technical performance (first-attempt deployment, insertion time, repositioning). Secondary outcomes assessed safety through intraoperative events and 30-day outcomes. Independent blinded video review by an external surgeon evaluated 40 consecutive cases.

resultsThe EICR achieved first-attempt deployment in 99% of cases, with median insertion time of 95 s (IQR 75-115). Repositioning occurred in 10.4%; no additional retraction trocars were required in any case. The device was used for liver retraction in 89.6% of cases, with retraction of a structure other than the liver in 8 of 96 patients (8.3%): the oesophagus in 7 and the greater omentum in 1. Minor retraction-related complications occurred in 5.2% (four serosal tears <5 mm, one hook disconnection), all managed conservatively. Liver function tests in complication cases were within normal limits; systematic cohort-wide testing was not performed. No major complications, conversions, or reoperations occurred. Independent blinded review demonstrated complete concordance with documented outcomes.

conclusionsAcross 96 consecutive procedures with independent blinded video validation, the EICR provided reliable, reproducible organ retraction with a rapid deployment time, an acceptable intraoperative safety profile, and no requirement for additional retraction trocars. Retraction was also achieved beyond the liver in 8 of 96 patients (oesophagus, 7; greater omentum, 1). As an uncontrolled single-surgeon series, this study demonstrates feasibility; comparative effectiveness against existing retraction methods now warrants prospective controlled evaluation.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidSurgical InstrumentsAdultEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesElastic intracorporeal retractorIntraoperative retractionLaparoscopic metabolic and bariatric surgeryLiver retractionMinimally invasive surgeryMulti-organ retractionTrocar-free technique

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.