ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Evolving Epidemiology and Implications for Prevention Policy.
Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), caused by Neisseria meningitidis, remains a rare but devastating condition characterized by rapid clinical progression, high case fatality, and long-term morbidity. Despite effective conjugate (or alternative) vaccine availability, sporadic cases and outbreaks persist across the age spectrum in the USA and globally. Contemporary surveillance data reveal a dynamic epidemiologic landscape, shifting serogroup dominance, evolving outbreak patterns involving community-based and socially connected groups, and growing recognition of disease burden among adults. Adolescents serve as key reservoirs of nasopharyngeal carriage; however, despite IMD incidence and case-fatality rates being highest among infants and older adults, respectively, both populations lack routine age-based vaccination recommendations. Prevention strategies in the USA remain anchored to historical incidence peaks and narrowly defined risk groups, leaving substantial gaps in protection, as highlighted by the sharp contrast between high adolescent quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine coverage and low serogroup B vaccine uptake under shared clinical decision-making. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on age-specific IMD burden, serogroup dynamics, and long-term sequelae, and critically examines how existing vaccination policies align with infection risk across the lifespan, with emphasis on US vaccination policy. Additional country-specific studies were included to contextualize age-specific epidemiology and provide policy comparators. A life-course-based prevention framework integrating age-related vulnerability, severity, and evolving transmission dynamics is needed to mitigate the burden of IMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42702664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.