ArticleScientific reports2026
Vestibular time constant and individual susceptibility to motion sickness in real-world driving.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motion sickness is an important challenge for the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. Although the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (MSSQ) is widely used, it relies on retrospective self-report and does not directly capture vestibular characteristics. This study examined the association between the vestibular time constant (VTC), which reflects the velocity storage mechanism, and motion sickness severity during on-road driving. VTC was measured in 24 female adults; 21 completed four 30-min acceleration sessions, and all 24 completed nine 30-min deceleration sessions involving regenerative braking. Motion sickness severity was repeatedly assessed using the Misery Scale (MISC). MSSQ scores showed weak, non-significant associations with MISC-derived outcomes, whereas longer VTCs were associated with greater symptom severity, particularly under deceleration and among participants who developed symptoms. Participant-level receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that the VTC discriminated participants who reached the nausea threshold (MISC ≥ 6) better than the MSSQ. Under deceleration, this difference was significant (area under the curve, 0.89 versus 0.60; DeLong p = 0.048). VTC associations were descriptively stronger under deceleration, possibly reflecting condition-specific characteristics of braking-related vestibular stimulation. These findings indicate that the VTC provides objective physiological information that may complement questionnaire-based susceptibility assessment in automotive environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.