ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2026
[Latent profile analysis of nurses
Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWith the rapid development of smart nursing, artificial intelligence (AI) systems for the dynamic assessment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk have gradually been introduced into clinical practice. As the direct users of such systems, nurses' acceptance substantially affects their effectiveness in clinical implementation. However, it remains unclear whether there is population heterogeneity in nurses' acceptance of AI-based dynamic VTE risk assessment. This study aims to identify latent profiles of nurses' acceptance of AI-based dynamic VTE risk assessment using latent profile analysis (LPA) and to explore the associated factors, thereby providing empirical evidence for development of targeted and stratified implementation and training strategies.
methodsConvenience sampling was used to survey nurses from tertiary hospitals in southern, central, and northern Anhui Province between April and June 2025. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Clinical Nurses' Behavior Scale for the Prevention of VTE in Hospitalized Patients, the Nurses' Professional Attitude Scale, and the Questionnaire on Nurses' Acceptance of AI-Based Dynamic VTE Risk Assessment. LPA was performed to identify latent profiles of nurses' acceptance, and multinomial Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors associated with profile membership.
resultsA total of 2 323 valid questionnaires were collected. Nurses' acceptance of AI-based dynamic VTE risk assessment was classified into 3 latent profiles: the low-acceptance-concerned resistance group [388 nurses (16.8%)], the moderate-acceptance-cautious observation group [1 177 nurses (50.5%)], and the high-acceptance-active adoption group [758 nurses (32.7%)]. Years of clinical experience, frequency of night shifts, scores on the knowledge dimension of the Clinical Nurses' Behavioral Scale for the Prevention of VTE in Hospitalized Patients, and scores on the Nurses' Professional Attitude Scale were factors associated with the latent profiles of nurses' acceptance of AI-based dynamic VTE risk assessment (all
conclusionsThere is substantial population heterogeneity in nurses' acceptance of AI-based dynamic VTE risk assessment. Hospital administrators should pay particular attention to nurses in the low-acceptance-concerned resistance and moderate-acceptance-cautious observation groups and implement targeted measures to improve their acceptance of this new technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.