ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Machine learning approaches for cancer prognosis and diagnosis via non-coding RNA: a comprehensive review.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), once considered genomic dark matter, are now established as key regulators of gene expression with widespread roles in cellular homeostasis and disease. In cancer, ncRNA expression is frequently and systematically dysregulated, and many of these molecules circulate in stable, protected form within biofluids, offering a compelling basis for non-invasive or minimally invasive diagnostic strategies. However, their clinical translation remains substantially hindered to date due to biological complexity, technical noise, and high dimensionality inherent to ncRNA expression datasets. In this context, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful analytical tool to address these challenges, enabling the identification of subtle, reproducible ncRNA signatures predictive of diverse malignancies. This review critically evaluates ML-driven frameworks for cancer diagnosis and prognosis across four ncRNA subclasses, namely miRNAs, lncRNAs, circRNAs, and piRNAs, while also acknowledging the biophysical and thermodynamic models that reinforce ncRNA bioinformatics. Despite substantial methodological progress in ML-based cancer diagnosis and prognosis, key challenges persist, including tumor biological heterogeneity, limited multicenter validation, and the lack of widely adopted standardized protocols for preprocessing, normalization, and reporting workflows. Furthermore, many current ML models lack interpretability in biological or clinical context, constraining their translational utility. By synthesizing recent advances and identifying unresolved barriers, this review charts a roadmap for developing a robust, clinically actionable ncRNA biomarker platform for cancer detection. With global cancer incidence projected to exceed 35 million annual cases by 2050, validated ncRNA-ML-driven frameworks hold potential to revolutionize early-stage detection and personalized therapeutic strategies, thereby reducing the escalating socio-economic burden of cancer worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.