ArticleBone & joint open2026
Implant size distribution and mid-term outcomes of transfibular total ankle arthroplasty in a Japanese cohort.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a widely accepted alternative to ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle arthritis. Preserving ankle motion is particularly relevant in Japanese populations, in which kneeling and squatting are integral to routine activities. However, Japanese individuals generally have smaller bone morphology than Western patients, raising concerns regarding the suitability of implant size variations originally designed for Western populations. This study aimed to examine implant size distribution, clinical and radiological outcomes, and implant survival rate following transfibular TAA in a Japanese cohort. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 50 patients (51 ankles) who underwent transfibular TAA between March 2019 and October 2022 with three or more more years of follow-up (mean 4.3 years (3.0 to 6.0, SD 0.9)). Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up using the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) and ankle range of motion. Radiological assessment comprised the lateral distal tibial angle, anterior distal tibial angle, tibiotalar angle, and tibiotalar ratio. Complications and implant survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, with implant removal as the endpoint. Results: Smaller implant sizes predominated, with size 2 (33.3%) and size 3 (37.3%) used most frequently; no patients required size 5 or 6. All SAFE-Q domains improved significantly from baseline, with mean changes exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. Range of motion increased by three months postoperatively and subsequently stabilized. Radiological parameters demonstrated satisfactory alignment and reduced coronal variance. Delayed wound healing occurred in 15.7% and medial malleolar fractures in 9.8%; all cases achieved bone union without additional intervention. Implant survival rate was 98.0% at three years and 95.5% at four years. Conclusion: Transfibular TAA produced favourable mid-term clinical, radiological, and survival outcomes in Japanese patients. The available implant size range adequately accommodated the smaller ankle morphology typical of Japanese patients. These findings may inform implant development and preoperative planning for populations with similar anatomical characteristics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.