ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Social health organizations and their role in the diffusion of minimally invasive surgery in Brazil.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Brazil, Social Health Organizations (SHOs), a form of public-private partnership, manage a growing number of public hospitals. This study assessed their role in the diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
methodsIn a nationwide study, the rates of laparoscopy were compared over time between SHO and non-SHO hospitals. We applied fixed-effects, Cox, and logistic regression models to examine the association between SHO and laparoscopy use, as well as the speed of laparoscopy adoption.
resultsOf the 2208 hospitals assessed, 83 were SHO-managed. These hospitals exhibited higher laparoscopy rates for both elective and urgent procedures. SHO hospitals had a higher likelihood of reaching ≥ 30% laparoscopy adoption earlier (HR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.84-2.23), and they reached the adoption threshold approximately one year earlier than non-SHO hospitals (mean time to adoption: 3.7 ± 5 vs. 4.5 ± 4.7 years, respectively).
conclusionSHO-managed hospitals were associated with faster and broader adoption of laparoscopic surgery within the Brazilian public healthcare system. These findings support the potential of hybrid governance models to enhance the delivery of care in low- and middle-income settings, while acknowledging that residual confounding and selection bias cannot be fully excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.