Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42702059›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2026

A New Method for Optimizing Spinal Canal Cross-Sectional Area During Laminoplasty: Lateral Mass Gutter.

Huajian Zhong, Yifan Wang, Yuefeng Zhu, Haoyi Wang, Guoqing Wen, Chen Xu, Leixin Wei, Huiqiao Wu, Yang Liu, Wen Yuan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huajian ZhongDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7149-4657
Yifan WangDepartment of Health Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yuefeng ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, Fudan University, Huadong Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Haoyi WangDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Guoqing WenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chen XuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Leixin WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Huiqiao WuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wen YuanDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0233-3578
Huajiang ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolong ShenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3620-460X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveTo propose a new technique named "lateral mass gutter" and investigate its role in augmenting spinal canal cross-sectional area (SCA) during laminoplasty.MethodsThis study included 105 patients who received cervical laminoplasty from February 2021 to February 2024. Patients were allocated to the conventional (CON) group or the lateral mass (LM) group according to the guttering technique used intraoperatively. Propensity score matching with a caliper of 0.2 was utilized to reduce selection bias. Intergroup comparisons encompassed clinical outcomes (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of neck pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score), radiographic measurements (SCA, laminoplasty opening angle (LOA), hinge fractures, hinge fusion, C2-7 Cobb angle) and postoperative complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, incisional fat liquefaction, C5 nerve root palsy, axial neck pain, cervical spine instability).ResultsFollowing propensity score matching, baseline parameters were comparable between the CON and LM groups (37 patients per group, P > 0.05). Compared to the CON group, the LM group exhibited a significantly smaller LOA, a lower incidence of hinge fractures, a higher rate of hinge fusion, greater improvement in JOA and a larger expansion in the SCA (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding VAS of neck pain or postoperative complications (P > 0.05).ConclusionCompared to conventional guttering technique, lateral mass gutter significantly reduces hinge fracture, promotes hinge fusion, enhances spinal canal expansion and optimizes postoperative neurological recovery in posterior cervical laminoplasty.

Indexed as

bony gutterlaminoplastylateral massspinal canal cross-sectional area

Identifiers

PMID42702059
PMCPMC13547551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.