ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
A New Method for Optimizing Spinal Canal Cross-Sectional Area During Laminoplasty: Lateral Mass Gutter.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveTo propose a new technique named "lateral mass gutter" and investigate its role in augmenting spinal canal cross-sectional area (SCA) during laminoplasty.MethodsThis study included 105 patients who received cervical laminoplasty from February 2021 to February 2024. Patients were allocated to the conventional (CON) group or the lateral mass (LM) group according to the guttering technique used intraoperatively. Propensity score matching with a caliper of 0.2 was utilized to reduce selection bias. Intergroup comparisons encompassed clinical outcomes (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of neck pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score), radiographic measurements (SCA, laminoplasty opening angle (LOA), hinge fractures, hinge fusion, C2-7 Cobb angle) and postoperative complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, incisional fat liquefaction, C5 nerve root palsy, axial neck pain, cervical spine instability).ResultsFollowing propensity score matching, baseline parameters were comparable between the CON and LM groups (37 patients per group, P > 0.05). Compared to the CON group, the LM group exhibited a significantly smaller LOA, a lower incidence of hinge fractures, a higher rate of hinge fusion, greater improvement in JOA and a larger expansion in the SCA (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding VAS of neck pain or postoperative complications (P > 0.05).ConclusionCompared to conventional guttering technique, lateral mass gutter significantly reduces hinge fracture, promotes hinge fusion, enhances spinal canal expansion and optimizes postoperative neurological recovery in posterior cervical laminoplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.