ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Comparative assessment of phytoremediation using Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, and Ipomoea aquatica floating beds for phytoplankton community restoration and microcystin-LR removal in eutrophic pond water.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological floating beds (EFBs) represent a sustainable, nature-based solution for remediating eutrophic waters, with plant species selection being a critical determinant of treatment performance. This study assessed the remediation potential of three floating macrophytes Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes, and Ipomoea aquatica under cyanobacterial bloom stress. Results demonstrated that all three species significantly reduced concentrations of dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus, with I. aquatica exhibiting the highest removal efficiencies (93.7% for both nitrogen and phosphorus). Notably, I. aquatica elicited a pronounced ecological shift in phytoplankton community structure, effectively suppressing cyanobacterial dominance while promoting the proliferation of green algae, including Scenedesmus, Dictyosphaerium, and Pediastrum. Meanwhile, the macrophytes accumulated microcystin-LR (MC-LR), predominantly in leaves, whereas MCs-degrading bacteria, such as Sphingomonas, Novosphingobium, and Pseudomonas, were detected in root-associated compartments. The notable enrichment of the Serratia further corroborated its putative role in algal toxin degradation within I. aquatica. Furthermore, all species exhibited physiological tolerance to bloom-induced oxidative stress, as evidenced by up-regulated antioxidant enzyme activities. Collectively, these findings support the integration of I. aquatica into EFB systems as an effective ecological management tool for restoring phytoplankton community structure and mitigating toxin risks in waters impacted by harmful algal blooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42701989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.