ReviewMusculoskeletal surgery2026
Torsional deformities and anterior knee pain: a systematic review and clinical approach to miserable malalignment syndrome.
Review in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advancements in understanding and treating anterior knee pain linked to lower limb torsional deformities, a definitive consensus on diagnostic criteria, clinical indications, and therapeutic strategies for "miserable malalignment syndrome" remains elusive. This systematic review synthesizes current research to unify understanding of this complex condition. Findings highlight varied definitions and surgical approaches, underscoring standardization challenges. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current research to provide a more unified understanding of this complex condition. While studies report favorable anatomical correction and symptomatic relief, inconsistent clinical outcome scores and limited long-term follow-up hinder robust comparisons. Conservative measures are often ineffective due to underlying mechanical imbalance; surgical interventions, primarily derotational osteotomies of the femur and/or tibia, offer the most direct anatomical correction. However, optimal level, extent, and timing of these osteotomies-whether single or double level, staged or simultaneous-are debated. Liße et al.'s proposed diagnostic criteria offer a valuable step towards standardized identification of true miserable malalignment syndrome. Future research, particularly robust multi-center studies with standardized outcome measures, is critically needed to establish clearer, evidence-based guidelines, ultimately improving patient care and long-term outcomes for this challenging condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42701950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.