Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701940›Full record

ReviewJournal of community health2026

A Systematic Review of the Prevalence and Microsystem Risk Factors of Bullying Victimization Among Adolescents.

Nanda Tri Rahmatika, Mahalul Azam, Bertakalswa Hermawati, Nabila Nur Afifah Fitri, Galuh Mega Kurnia, Erlin Friska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nanda Tri RahmatikaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Jl. Kelud Utara III No. 15, Petompon, Gajahmungkur District, Semarang, Central Java, 50237, Indonesia. nanda.rahmatika@mail.unnes.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0905-7862
Mahalul AzamDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Jl. Kelud Utara III No. 15, Petompon, Gajahmungkur District, Semarang, Central Java, 50237, Indonesia.
Bertakalswa HermawatiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Jl. Kelud Utara III No. 15, Petompon, Gajahmungkur District, Semarang, Central Java, 50237, Indonesia.
Nabila Nur Afifah FitriDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, Lampung, Indonesia.
Galuh Mega KurniaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Jl. Kelud Utara III No. 15, Petompon, Gajahmungkur District, Semarang, Central Java, 50237, Indonesia.
Erlin FriskaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Jl. Kelud Utara III No. 15, Petompon, Gajahmungkur District, Semarang, Central Java, 50237, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullying has substantial short- and long-term psychological consequences for adolescents. However, systematic reviews synthesizing global evidence on the prevalence of bullying victimization and its microsystem risk factors remain limited. This review aimed to synthesize evidence on the prevalence of bullying victimization and identify microsystem risk factors at the individual, family, peer, and school levels among adolescents. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest were searched for original quantitative studies involving adolescents aged 12-19 years that reported the prevalence and risk factors of bullying victimization. Review articles, qualitative studies, studies outside the target age range, studies focusing only on bullying perpetration, and those without prevalence or risk factor data were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Hoy Risk of Bias Tool. Findings were synthesized narratively by bullying type and microsystem domain. Twenty-six studies involving 138,506 adolescents were included. The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization ranged from 3.37% to 86.2%, while cyberbullying victimization ranged from 2.13% to 52.2%. Thirty-one microsystem risk factors were identified across four domains. The most consistently reported factors were younger age, male sex, frequent internet or social media use, psychological distress, poor parent-child relationships and parental support, low peer support, previous bullying experiences, and limited teacher support. Bullying victimization remains a major public health concern among adolescents. Prevention strategies should target multiple microsystem domains, particularly family, peer, and school environments, while future studies should adopt standardized definitions and measurement approaches to improve comparability.

Indexed as

AdolescentBullyingCyberbullyingPrevalenceRisk factorsSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.