ArticleOecologia2026
Hyperabundance of a subordinate herbivorous gastropod causes localised overgrazing within kelp beds.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herbivory is a fundamental biological process that can determine the structure and functioning of ecosystems. On temperate reefs worldwide, herbivory by grazing macro-invertebrates can cause extensive overgrazing of kelp beds when grazers reach hyperabundance. Rising to local dominance, typically it is the grazing activity of a single species amongst others that is responsible for overgrazed 'barrens'. However, the potential for subordinate grazing species to impact kelp beds is less understood and often overlooked. Here we observe apparent 'barren' patches within kelp beds associated with local hyperabundance of a subordinate grazer, the turbinid periwinkle Lunella undulata, in eastern Tasmania. We demonstrate capacity for this periwinkle to overgraze by deploying a caging experiment on a 'peri-barren' patch, involving inclusion and exclusion treatments, plus cage and background control plots. Fleshy macroalgae proliferated in cages excluding periwinkles, reaching mean percentage cover of 47 ± 8% SE by end of the 117-day experiment, which was 5-fold, 6-fold, and 10-fold higher than in partially caged plots, open plots, and periwinkle inclusion cages, respectively. Indicating cascading effects of harvesting, legal-sized periwinkles were commercially harvested from the peri-barren during the study, leading to algal recovery across all treatments except for periwinkle inclusion cages where overgrazing persisted. Kelp bed recovery ensued as periwinkle biomass declined, while cover of fleshy algae increased over ~ 16 months. Reflecting the ongoing trophic and climate cascades in eastern Tasmania, we hypothesise that increased harvesting of the now dominant grazer, the range-extending urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii, has enabled localised competitive release of the subordinate periwinkle grazer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.