ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Primary care anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody testing for rheumatoid arthritis and accompanying pathway redesign reduces unnecessary referrals.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are alternative diagnostic tests for RA with similar sensitivity. Anti-CCP antibodies have improved specificity compared with RF and so should result in fewer false positives. A retrospective, observational study was conducted following a change in the primary care pathway and test for inflammatory arthritis from RF to anti-CCP antibodies, assessing real-world impact on referrals. Methods: The primary care test was changed from RF to anti-CCP antibodies as part of a service development in East and North Devon, UK (population 463 000). Data were monitored post-implementation from 1 March to 31 August 2024. Anti-CCP antibody testing was made available to primary care. General practitioner order communications automatically redirected requests for RF to anti-CCP antibodies. Local referral guidelines were implemented recommending anti-CCP antibodies to support referral decisions but not for rule-out of inflammatory arthritis. The equivalent 6-month period from 2023 when RF was the primary test for inflammatory arthritis was used for comparison. Results: Positive tests decreased from 10.6% with RF to 3.9% with anti-CCP antibodies. This led to 57 (39%) fewer referrals following a positive test. The false positive rate among those referred to rheumatology decreased from 59% (91/148) with RF to 32% (29/91) with anti-CCP antibodies. Anti-CCP antibodies and RF detected similar numbers of inflammatory arthritis cases with a case yield of 2.1% for both tests. Conclusion: Replacement of RF with anti-CCP antibodies within a redesigned inflammatory arthritis pathway reduced unnecessary rheumatology referrals. This could help oversubscribed services reduce waiting times and thus contribute to timely diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.