ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Beyond Traditional Psychiatric Care: A Systematic Review of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Mitigating Adolescent Suicide Risk.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization estimates that more than 720,000 people die by suicide each year and that suicide is the third leading cause of death among individuals aged 15 to 29 years; in the United States it ranks second among those aged 10 to 24 years. Rising adolescent ideation, planning and attempts have exposed the limits of siloed care. Methods: This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA 2020, incorporating scoping elements for guidelines and policy frameworks. Nine databases were searched for English-language literature published between January 2018 and February 2026. Of 7496 records identified and 1680 screened after duplicate removal, 26 sources met the inclusion criteria. Design-appropriate instruments (AMSTAR 2, RoB 2, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, CASP) were used to appraise quality. Given heterogeneous designs, no meta-analysis was performed; findings were synthesized narratively across five pre-specified domains, with risk determinants organized using the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Results: HiTOP dimensions of fear, distress, externalization, thought disorder and traumatic stress organized otherwise disparate risk data. Medically and legally complex subgroups, including adolescents with thalassemia major and justice-involved youth, carried compounded risk requiring cross-sectoral care. In primary care, universal screening and the Safety Planning Intervention with structured follow-up were the best-supported components. Pharmacogenomic testing showed consistent genotype-outcome associations but modest and inconsistent clinical benefit in randomized data, with no adolescent trial reporting suicide outcomes. School programs improved help-seeking and mental health literacy more reliably than they reduced attempts. Digital monitoring achieved high temporal resolution but low positive predictive value. Role ambiguity, non-interoperable records and unmanaged care transitions were the dominant implementation barriers. Conclusion: Coordinated multidisciplinary care is supported, but the strength of evidence differs sharply by component. Care navigation, shared risk registries and integrated behavioral health warrant priority; pharmacogenomic and algorithmic tools require adolescent-specific trials before routine adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.