Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701746›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Fracture strength evaluation for different posts in endodontically treated teeth.

Manmeet Kaur, Shanta Chopra, Unnati Nautiyal, Alka Gagneja, Jasmeet Kaur, Mohini Garg

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manmeet KaurDepartment of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, LuxmiBai Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital,Patiala, Punjab, India.
Shanta ChopraDepartment of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge and Oral Implantology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozpur, Punjab, India.
Unnati NautiyalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Alka GagnejaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Shaheed Kartar Singh Sarabha Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Jasmeet KaurDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Geethanjali Dental & Research Institute, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Mohini GargDepartment of Prosthodontics, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of endodontically treated teeth with severe loss of coronal structure is challenging, fracture resistance of such teeth can be improved using various types of post and core restoration. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the fracture resistance of different post systems in endodontically treated. Extracted maxillary incisors after endodontic treatment were randomly divided into 4 groups based on type of post used. Compressive load required to fracture the post treated tooth was measured using a universal testing machine. Thus, zirconia posts showed greatest fracture resistance compared to other tested post systems.

Indexed as

Endodontic toothfracture resistancepost and core

Identifiers

PMID42701746
PMCPMC13545946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.