Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701736›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on post-operative outcomes in elective abdominal surgeries: A prospective study.

Irfan Ahmad Siddiqui, Sushil Chand Verma, Ajita Tiwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irfan Ahmad SiddiquiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sushil Chand VermaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Birsa Munda Government Medical College, Shahdol Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ajita TiwariDepartment of Anaesthesia, Birsa Munda Government Medical College, Shahdol Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based perioperative approach designed to minimize surgical stress and enhance post- operative recovery. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols on post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries. This prospective comparative study included 100 patients who were divided into ERAS and conventional care groups, with assessment of recovery parameters, pain scores, complications and hospital stay. Patients managed with ERAS protocols demonstrated significantly reduced hospital stay, faster return of bowel function, lower post-operative pain scores and fewer complications compared to conventional care. Thus, data shows that ERAS protocols are effective in improving post-operative outcomes and should be considered as a standard perioperative care strategy in abdominal surgeries.

Indexed as

abdominal surgerycomplicationsEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)hospital staypost-operative recovery

Identifiers

PMID42701736
PMCPMC13545950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.