Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701702›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Impact of Loading Doses of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Left Ventricular and Left Atrial Thrombus: The LOAD-LVT Study.

Kyle G Fischer, Zaynab Omisade, Pratham Patel, Taylor Gorski, Evan J Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle G FischerDepartment of Pharmacy, Ascension Texas, Austin, USA.
Zaynab OmisadeDepartment of Pharmacy, Ascension Texas, Austin, USA.
Pratham PatelDepartment of Pharmacy, Ascension Texas, Austin, USA.
Taylor GorskiDepartment of Pharmacy, Ascension Texas, Austin, USA.
Evan J PetersonDepartment of Pharmacy, Ascension Texas, Austin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) thrombi are associated with significant thromboembolic risk, particularly in the context of myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recognized as alternatives to warfarin, current studies have not evaluated the utility of loading doses, as routinely used in venous thromboembolism (VTE). The LOAD-LVT study aims to determine whether loading doses of apixaban or rivaroxaban influence bleeding risk, thromboembolic events, or thrombus resolution. Methods and results A multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients with confirmed LV or LA thrombus treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban at five Ascension hospitals in Texas between January 2017 and November 2024 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups: receiving a DOAC loading dose (apixaban 10 mg twice daily for seven days or rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 21 days) and receiving standard or renal-adjusted dosing. The primary outcome was the incidence of major and non-major bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included thromboembolic events and thrombus resolution on follow-up imaging at three and six months. A total of 135 patients were included; 23 (17%) received a loading dose. No major bleeding or thromboembolic events were observed in either group. Non-major bleeding occurred in 9% of patients in the loading group versus 4.5% in the standard group (p = 0.404). Of the 135 patients analyzed, 34.8% in the loading dose group and 33.9% in the standard dose group had follow-up imaging. Among those with repeat imaging, complete resolution was documented in 75% of the patients in the loading dose group compared to 86.8% in the standard dose group (p = 0.807). No significant differences were observed in time to thrombus resolution or outcomes by subgroup. Conclusion In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, no significant conclusions could be made regarding loading doses of DOACs vs. standard dosing in assessing thrombus resolution or bleeding in patients with LV or LA thrombus. The optimal dosing strategy remains uncertain and should be further evaluated in prospective, randomized trials designed to assess clinical outcomes such as embolic events, bleeding, and thrombus resolution to answer this important and understudied clinical question.

Indexed as

direct oral anticoagulants (doacs)left atrial thrombusleft ventricular thrombus (lvt)oral anticoagulationthrombus formation

Identifiers

PMID42701702
PMCPMC13546087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.