ArticleCureus2026
YouTube as a Reliable Source of Patient Education for Peyronie's Disease: A Quality Assessment Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeyronie's disease (PD) is a penile connective tissue disorder characterized by fibrous plaque formation within the tunica albuginea, resulting in penile curvature, pain, deformity, and impaired sexual function. Due to embarrassment and limited awareness, many patients seek health information online, with YouTube becoming a widely used source of medical education. However, the quality and reliability of PD-related YouTube content remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the quality, reliability, and educational value of YouTube videos related to PD and assess their suitability as a patient information resource.
methodsA YouTube search was conducted on May 20, 2026, using five predefined search terms related to PD. The first 20 videos from each search were screened. Videos were included if they were English-language, patient-oriented educational videos lasting between 1 and 20 minutes. Video characteristics were recorded, and content quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria. Statistical analysis included one-sample t-tests and Spearman's rank correlation analysis.
resultsOf 100 screened videos, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The mean video duration was 4:03 ± 3:08 minutes, with a mean of 212,275 ± 440,000 views. The mean total DISCERN score was 51.42 ± 9.59, indicating lower-range good-quality information, with no significant difference from the score of 51, which is the good-quality threshold (p = 0.883). Individual DISCERN domains, compared to the midpoint score of 3, demonstrated statistically significantly higher scores for clarity of aims (3.92 ± 1.08, p = 0.0137), achievement of aims (3.67 ± 0.98, p = 0.0388), and relevance to patients (3.83 ± 0.94, p = 0.0105). The mean GQS score of 2.92 ± 1.38 was consistent with moderate educational quality and did not differ significantly from the reference score of 3 for moderate-quality educational content (p = 0.838). The mean JAMA Benchmark Criteria score was 1.50 ± 1.23, indicating low reliability. No significant correlations were identified between DISCERN, GQS, and JAMA scores.
conclusionYouTube videos regarding PD provide generally acceptable but inconsistent educational value and reliability. While many videos effectively address patient concerns, important deficiencies remain in treatment-related information, transparency, and evidence-based content. Patients should be encouraged to critically evaluate online information, and clinicians should guide individuals toward reliable educational resources. Further development of transparent, comprehensive, and patient-centered digital resources is required to improve online education for men with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.