ArticleCancer management and research2026
Baseline Gustave Roussy Immune Score and Survival in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: First-line chemoimmunotherapy has improved outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but survival remains heterogeneous and routine-care prognostic tools are limited. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive adults with stage IV ES-SCLC treated with platinum-etoposide plus a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor at three Spanish hospitals from August 2021 to December 2024. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response, and immune-related toxicity. Baseline Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm) was defined as high-risk when at least two of albumin <35 g/L, lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >6 were present. Baseline Cox models included high-risk GRIm, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio >180, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2; maintenance exposure was assessed in a 3-month OS landmark analysis. Analyses were exploratory. Results: Among 51 patients, mean age was 64.2 years, 72.5% were men, and 82.3% had ECOG performance status 0-1. During follow-up, 43 deaths and 50 PFS events occurred. Objective response rate was 70.6%, median OS was 11.9 months, and median PFS was 5.7 months. Median OS was 14.2 months with low-risk GRIm and 5.4 months with high-risk GRIm. High-risk GRIm was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 5.59) and PFS (HR 3.50), while PLR >180 was associated with worse OS (HR 2.37). In the 3-month landmark cohort (n=47), maintenance exposure remained associated with longer OS (HR 0.21), although this analysis remained vulnerable to residual selection bias. Conclusion: Baseline GRIm was the most consistent candidate prognostic marker in this real-world ES-SCLC cohort. The study did not assess prediction of immunotherapy benefit, and prospective validation is warranted before treatment decisions are guided by GRIm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.