Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701626›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Exploratory Pilot Study on the Tolerability and Ocular Surface Effects of Liposomal Ozonated Oil Compared with Standard Prophylaxis in Cataract Surgery. The CAREST Study.

Dolores López Bernal, Ginés Gea Martínez, Jose Javier Garcia-Medina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dolores López BernalGeneral University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, 30008, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6646-392X
Ginés Gea MartínezGeneral University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, 30008, Spain.
Jose Javier Garcia-MedinaGeneral University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, 30008, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6245-7271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To obtain preliminary data on the tolerability and ocular surface outcomes of liposomal ozonated oil compared with standard prophylaxis in cataract surgery. Patients and Methods: This open-label, prospective, contralateral-eye controlled pilot study included 60 eyes from 33 adult patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery. For each patient, one eye was treated with liposomal ozonated oil (one drop, four times daily) from 3 days before surgery until 21 days postoperatively, while the contralateral eye received standard treatment. The study outcomes included treatment tolerability, postoperative infectious complications, ocular signs and symptoms, Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), visual acuity, anterior chamber reaction (Tyndall effect), and patient-reported discomfort. Assessments were performed at postoperative day 21, with exploratory follow-up evaluations at month 3. Results: No postoperative infectious complications were observed in either treatment group. No significant between-group differences were observed in most evaluated ocular surface parameters at postoperative day 21 and month 3. At postoperative day 21, fewer patients in the liposomal ozonated oil group reported foreign body sensation and a higher proportion had TBUT > 10 seconds, although these differences were not statistically significant. At month 3, foreign body sensation was reported more frequently in the liposomal ozonated oil group, whereas no other significant between-group differences were observed. The majority of patients showed no anterior chamber reaction at postoperative day 21 (96.67%), and all patients reported good tolerability and no discomfort. Conclusion: Liposomal ozonated oil was well tolerated and showed comparable clinical outcomes to standard prophylaxis following cataract surgery. The findings of this pilot study suggest potential benefits for ocular surface outcomes that warrant confirmation in adequately powered studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up. No infectious complications occurred in either treatment group; however, the absence of events and the limited sample size preclude conclusions regarding its potential role in infection prevention. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered in the Spanish Registry for Post-Marketing Clinical Investigations with Medical Devices (NEOPS; Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices, AEMPS) under registration code 22-0061.e (September 6, 2022).

Indexed as

cataract surgeryliposomal ozonated oilocular infectionsOSDITBUT

Identifiers

PMID42701626
PMCPMC13546010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.