Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701587›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Effect of amlodipine and telmisartan on bone metabolism markers in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

Kamlesh Garg, Perumal Raveendranath, Sameer Gulati, Sufian Zaheer, Amita Yadav, Ruchika Nandha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kamlesh GargDepartment of Pathology, Pharmacology, & Biochemistry, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Perumal RaveendranathDepartment of Pathology, Pharmacology, & Biochemistry, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sameer GulatiDepartment of Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Sufian ZaheerDepartment of Pathology, Pharmacology, & Biochemistry, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Amita YadavDepartment of Pathology, Pharmacology, & Biochemistry, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ruchika NandhaDepartment of Pharmacology, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension may adversely affect bone health, but the skeletal effects of commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs remain inadequately u nderstood. In this 24-week prospective study, 96 newly diagnosed Stage I hypertensive patients received either Amlodipine (5-10 mg) or Telmisartan (40-80 mg), with serial assessment of bone metabolism markers. Both drugs achieved comparable blood pressure control throughout the study period. Telmisartan significantly reduced PTH and IL-6 levels while enhancing BS-ALP and transiently increasing osteocalcin, whereas Amlodipine demonstrated only a temporary rise in BS-ALP. Thus, data shows the telmisartan may provide additional benefits on bone remodeling and skeletal health in hypertensive patients at risk of fragility.

Indexed as

amlodipineBone metabolism markersbone-specific alkaline phosphatasebone turnover markershypertensioninterleukin-6osteocalcinparathormonetelmisartan

Identifiers

PMID42701587
PMCPMC13545871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.