Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42701552›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Clinical prognostic value of imaging and immuno-hormonal markers in uterine leiomyoma.

Nigora Khahramonovna Dustova, Aliya Meirmanova, Gulzhakhan Omarova, Ainura Veliyeva, Zhanara Begniyazova, Zhanar Buzumova, Elmira Makhmutova, Ainura Yuldasheva, Gulnara Djumaniyazovna Matrizaeva, Nigora Bakhodirovna Khaydarova and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nigora Khahramonovna Dustova *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bukhara State Medical Institute, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Aliya Meirmanova *Department of Obstetric Gynecology and Clinical Genetics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Gulzhakhan OmarovaDepartment of Obstetric Gynecology and Clinical Genetics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Ainura VeliyevaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kazakh National University named after Al-Farabi, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Zhanara BegniyazovaDepartment of Obstetric Gynecology and Clinical Genetics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Zhanar BuzumovaDepartment of Obstetric Gynecology and Clinical Genetics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Elmira MakhmutovaDepartment of Obstetric Gynecology and Clinical Genetics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Ainura YuldashevaDepartment of Obstetric Gynecology and Clinical Genetics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Gulnara Djumaniyazovna MatrizaevaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tashkent Medical Academy Urganch Branch, Urgench, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Nigora Bakhodirovna KhaydarovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bukhara State Medical Institute, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Feruza Shopulotovna OripovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bukhara State Medical Institute, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Dilnoza Bakhodurovna KhafizovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bukhara State Medical Institute, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Elnora Elbekovna KarshievaTashkent Medical University, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Nodira Khakimovna RuzievaTashkent Medical University, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan.
Gulchekhra Akmalovna IkhtiyarovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bukhara State Medical Institute, Bukhara, Republic of Uzbekistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uterine leiomyoma is a prevalent benign tumor arising from the smooth muscle cells of the uterine wall, profoundly affecting women's reproductive health and overall quality of life. Despite extensive studies on hormonal and molecular genetic mechanisms, its pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Increasing evidence suggests that cytokines, growth factors, and immune-hormonal interactions may play a key role in tumor progression and recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of imaging, immunological, and hormonal markers in the assessment of antitumor immune response and clinical outcomes in women of reproductive age with uterine leiomyoma. Methods: A total of 61 women diagnosed with uterine leiomyoma were examined at the Gynecology Department of Bukhara Outpatient Polyclinic (OPC). Clinical, biochemical, hormonal, and immunological parameters were analyzed using standard laboratory assays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Statistical analysis included comparative, correlational, and regression methods to identify prognostic indicators. Results: Hereditary predisposition, history of medical abortion, and excess body weight were identified as major risk factors. Elevated serum biomarker levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (>95.1 pg/mL), estradiol (>40.5 pg/mL), and fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) (>81.4 pg/mL) significantly increased the likelihood of leiomyoma development (P<0.05). Enhancing antiproliferative activity of transforming growth factor beta-2 (TGF-β2) and reducing progesterone synthesis reflected impaired growth-factor-mediated regulation and potential neoplastic transformation. Serum levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA-19-9) were significantly elevated in women with uterine leiomyoma compared with controls (P<0.0001). MRI findings demonstrated heterogeneous leiomyoma morphology with variable localization, vascularization, and nodular architecture. Macroscopic examination revealed well-circumscribed firm nodules with a characteristic whorled appearance. Histological analysis confirmed benign smooth muscle proliferation with interlacing fascicles, minimal atypia, connective tissue stroma, and variable fibrotic or vascular changes. Conclusions: Uterine leiomyoma is characterized by elevated tumor markers, hormonal dysregulation, inflammatory and angiogenic activation, and distinct radiological and morphological features. Integrated evaluation of biochemical, imaging, and histopathological parameters may improve diagnostic assessment, characterization of tumor heterogeneity, and individualized management strategies in women with uterine leiomyoma. Integration of imaging findings with immuno-hormonal biomarkers may improve early detection, risk stratification, and individualized management of uterine leiomyoma.

Indexed as

biomarkersimaging prognosisLeiomyoma

Identifiers

PMID42701552
PMCPMC13545587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.