ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is associated with elevated cardiovascular risk, yet early subclinical myocardial changes often go undetected by conventional imaging. This study aimed to determine whether patients with INOCA exhibit subclinical tissue alterations identified by T1 mapping and left ventricular wall motion abnormalities assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT), in comparison with matched healthy controls (HC). Methods: A total of 44 patients with INOCA and 22 matched HC were prospectively enrolled from August 2024 to February 2026, and all underwent hybrid cardiac positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) examination. CMR-derived parameters were obtained and compared across the study groups. Results: Native T1 values increased progressively across three groups: HC, INOCA with myocardial flow reserve (MFR) >2, and INOCA with MFR <2 (1,196±19 Conclusions: Native T1 and GLS correlate with impaired MFR in patients with INOCA, consistent with subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction related to myocardial ischemia. Incorporating CMR into clinical practice may aid in the monitoring and treatment of patients with INOCA, and further studies exploring the underlying mechanisms are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.