ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
The value of CMR-derived left atrial strain parameters in differential diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Differentiating cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is clinically challenging due to overlapping phenotypes of left ventricular hypertrophy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left atrial strain parameters in differentiating CA from HCM. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on CMR data obtained from 37 patients with HCM, 41 patients with CA, and 29 individuals in the normal control group. Left ventricular and left atrial functions were quantified using CVI42 software (version 5.14.2). Left atrial strain parameters were assessed using the tissue tracking module, including left atrial reservoir strain (εs) and strain rate (SRs), conduit strain (εe) and strain rate (SRe), and booster strain (εa) and strain rate (SRa). Differences in left ventricular and left atrial functional parameters, as well as left atrial strain parameters among the three groups, were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using MedCalc (version 15.2.2) to determine the diagnostic efficacy of left atrial strain parameters in differentiating CA from HCM. Results: The absolute values of εs, εe, εa, SRs, SRe, and SRa were significantly lower in both the HCM and CA groups compared with the normal control group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the absolute values of these parameters were markedly lower in CA compared with HCM (P<0.05). Among these parameters, εs demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for distinguishing CA from HCM, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.921. Conclusions: CMR-derived left atrial strain parameters, particularly εs, might serve as a reliable means for differentiating between HCM and CA, which need further prospective study including patients with all HCM types and conducting internal and external validation to confirm credibility and expand generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.